Professors Censored by FB over Covid Research

02/12/2021

"Anyone who argues by referring to authority is not using his mind but rather his memory." ~Leonardo Da Vinci

More and more crackdowns are occurring on those who question the COVID narrative.

The Facts:
The Great Barrington Declaration recently had its Facebook Page disabled. The page has recently been restored, but these scientists have been subjected to censorship on an unprecedented level.
Reflect On:
Why are so many scientists and doctors being ridiculed, censored and ignored for simply presenting information that contradicts what we are hearing from government health authorities when it comes to all things COVID?

Bhattacharya is actually one of four medical professors from Stanford that recently published a study showing that lockdowns, stay at home orders and business closures are not an effective tool for stopping the spread of COVID. There are dozens of other studies showing the same thing. Shortly before this he wrote an article for The Hill explaining damage that goes far beyond economics, and that lockdowns may harm hundreds of millions of people from other causes.

Keep in mind, all of this is being done for a virus that has a 99.95 percent survival rate for people under the age of 70.

The Great Barrington Declaration:

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all - including the vulnerable - falls.

We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity - i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable - and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. - We call this Focused Protection.

Make no mistake, science is being censored at an unprecedented level...

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health. Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency-a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. - Dr. Kamran Abbasi, recent executive editor of the prestigious British Medical Journal, editor of the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, and a consultant editor for PLOS Medicine. He is editor of the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and JRSM Open. (source)

One positive result of all of the censorship we are seeing is the fact that many people are aware of it. The censorship in itself has truly been a catalyst for more people to question and start thinking critically, as are most global events that are surrounded by "chaos."

Why do we live the way we live? Why are we so polarized to the point where we can't even have conversations with each other? Why does mainstream media fail to have proper discussions about "controversial" viewpoints and issues?

https://www.collective-evolution.com/